TY - JOUR
T1 - Variability in Response to Quadripulse Stimulation of the Motor Cortex
AU - Nakamura, Koichiro
AU - Groiss, Stefan Jun
AU - Hamada, Masashi
AU - Enomoto, Hiroyuki
AU - Kadowaki, Suguru
AU - Abe, Mitsunari
AU - Murakami, Takenobu
AU - Wiratman, Winnugroho
AU - Chang, Fangyu
AU - Kobayashi, Shunsuke
AU - Hanajima, Ritsuko
AU - Terao, Yasuo
AU - Ugawa, Yoshikazu
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by grants from the Research Project Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology No. 25461322 (HE), No. 26860675 (TM), 15H01563 (TM), No. 22390181 (YU), No. 25293206 (YU), No 15H05881 (YU), No. 22590954 (YT), No. 23591270 (RH); JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 15H01658 (MH) and 15K19476 (MH); the Takeda Science Foundation (TM), the Kanae Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Science (TM), the Research Committee on Degenerative Ataxia from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan H26-030 ; the Magnetic Health Science Foundation ; the Uehara Memorial Foundation and The Novartis Foundation (Japan) for the Promotion of Science (YU).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Author(s)
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Background Responses to plasticity-inducing brain stimulation protocols are highly variable. However, no data are available concerning the variability of responses to quadripulse stimulation (QPS). Objective We assessed the QPS parameters of motor cortical plasticity induction in a systematic manner, and later investigated the variability of QPS using optimal parameters. Methods First, two different interburst intervals (IBI) with the same total number of pulses were compared. Next we investigated three different IBIs with a different total number of pulses but with same duration of intervention. We also compared the after-effects of monophasic and biphasic QPS. Finally, variability of QPS was tested in 35 healthy subjects. Twenty motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured every 5–10 min for up to one hour after intervention. Results QPS at an IBI of 5 s produced MEPs changes that are dependent on the interstimulus interval of the four magnetic pulses, consistent with previous reports. Unexpectedly, QPS at an IBI of 2.5 s did not induce any plasticity, even with the same total number of pulses, that is, 1440. QPS at an IBI of 7.5 s produced a variable response but was likely to be comparable to conventional QPS. Biphasic QPS had shorter lasting after-effects compared with monophasic QPS. Finally, the after-effects of QPS were relatively consistent across subjects: more than 80% of subjects responded as expected in the excitatory QPS at an IBI of 5 s. Conclusions The IBI, total duration of the procedure and pulse waveform strongly affected the magnitude or duration of the plasticity induced by QPS. In this cohort, 80% of subjects responded to excitatory QPS as expected.
AB - Background Responses to plasticity-inducing brain stimulation protocols are highly variable. However, no data are available concerning the variability of responses to quadripulse stimulation (QPS). Objective We assessed the QPS parameters of motor cortical plasticity induction in a systematic manner, and later investigated the variability of QPS using optimal parameters. Methods First, two different interburst intervals (IBI) with the same total number of pulses were compared. Next we investigated three different IBIs with a different total number of pulses but with same duration of intervention. We also compared the after-effects of monophasic and biphasic QPS. Finally, variability of QPS was tested in 35 healthy subjects. Twenty motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured every 5–10 min for up to one hour after intervention. Results QPS at an IBI of 5 s produced MEPs changes that are dependent on the interstimulus interval of the four magnetic pulses, consistent with previous reports. Unexpectedly, QPS at an IBI of 2.5 s did not induce any plasticity, even with the same total number of pulses, that is, 1440. QPS at an IBI of 7.5 s produced a variable response but was likely to be comparable to conventional QPS. Biphasic QPS had shorter lasting after-effects compared with monophasic QPS. Finally, the after-effects of QPS were relatively consistent across subjects: more than 80% of subjects responded as expected in the excitatory QPS at an IBI of 5 s. Conclusions The IBI, total duration of the procedure and pulse waveform strongly affected the magnitude or duration of the plasticity induced by QPS. In this cohort, 80% of subjects responded to excitatory QPS as expected.
KW - Motor cortex
KW - Plasticity
KW - Quadripulse stimulation (QPS)
KW - Variability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994831208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994831208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brs.2016.01.008
DO - 10.1016/j.brs.2016.01.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84994831208
SN - 1935-861X
VL - 9
SP - 859
EP - 866
JO - Brain Stimulation
JF - Brain Stimulation
IS - 6
ER -