TY - JOUR
T1 - What Determines the Lifetime of Photoexcited Carriers on TiO2 Surfaces?
AU - Ozawa, Kenichi
AU - Yamamoto, Susumu
AU - Yukawa, Ryu
AU - Liu, Roya
AU - Emori, Masato
AU - Inoue, Koki
AU - Higuchi, Taku
AU - Sakama, Hiroshi
AU - Mase, Kazuhiko
AU - Matsuda, Iwao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2016/12/29
Y1 - 2016/12/29
N2 - Pump-probe time-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements have been carried out to comparatively assess the relaxation process of the photoexcited states on pristine and Ar+-sputtered TiO2(110) surfaces and a TiO2(011)-2 × 1 surface, on which the accumulation-type space charge layers are developed. Ultraviolet laser irradiation induces a surface photovoltage (SPV) of around 0.1 eV. The SPV relaxation time on pristine TiO2(110) is determined to be approximately 100 ns and is doubled on the sputtered surface. In contrast, a much shorter time of 1 ns is observed on TiO2(011)-2 × 1. The difference in the relaxation time on the two TiO2(110) surfaces is explained by differences in the O vacancy density on the surface as well as the barrier height of the surface potential for the photoexcited holes. A large hole capture cross section of a state characteristic of TiO2(011)-2 × 1 is, on the other hand, responsible for the fast SPV relaxation on this surface.
AB - Pump-probe time-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements have been carried out to comparatively assess the relaxation process of the photoexcited states on pristine and Ar+-sputtered TiO2(110) surfaces and a TiO2(011)-2 × 1 surface, on which the accumulation-type space charge layers are developed. Ultraviolet laser irradiation induces a surface photovoltage (SPV) of around 0.1 eV. The SPV relaxation time on pristine TiO2(110) is determined to be approximately 100 ns and is doubled on the sputtered surface. In contrast, a much shorter time of 1 ns is observed on TiO2(011)-2 × 1. The difference in the relaxation time on the two TiO2(110) surfaces is explained by differences in the O vacancy density on the surface as well as the barrier height of the surface potential for the photoexcited holes. A large hole capture cross section of a state characteristic of TiO2(011)-2 × 1 is, on the other hand, responsible for the fast SPV relaxation on this surface.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027297965&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027297965&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10136
DO - 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10136
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85027297965
SN - 1932-7447
VL - 120
SP - 29283
EP - 29289
JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry C
JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry C
IS - 51
ER -