TY - JOUR
T1 - What drove the evolutionary trend of planktic foraminifers during the Cretaceous
T2 - Oceanic Anoxic Events (OAEs) directly affected it?
AU - Kuroyanagi, Azumi
AU - Kawahata, Hodaka
AU - Ozaki, Kazumi
AU - Suzuki, Atsushi
AU - Nishi, Hiroshi
AU - Takashima, Reishi
N1 - Funding Information:
The manuscript has been improved with the help of constructive comments by K. Husum and an anonymous reviewer. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of J. Arimoto, E. Sakaki, and the staff of Tohoku University and Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute (AORI) for their helpful suggestions and support. This study was carried out with the support of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant (JP19K04053) and TUMUGU Fund (Tohoku University) to A. Kuroyanagi and JSPS KAKENHI Grant to R. Takashima (JP17K05674 and JP18KK0091) and to A. Suzuki (JP18K18793)
Funding Information:
The manuscript has been improved with the help of constructive comments by K. Husum and an anonymous reviewer. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of J. Arimoto, E. Sakaki, and the staff of Tohoku University and Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute (AORI) for their helpful suggestions and support. This study was carried out with the support of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant ( JP19K04053 ) and TUMUGU Fund (Tohoku University) to A. Kuroyanagi and JSPS KAKENHI Grant to R. Takashima ( JP17K05674 and JP18KK0091 ) and to A. Suzuki ( JP18K18793 )
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - The oceanic redox state has played an essential role in the evolution of life on earth, and oceanic “anoxic events” have been proposed as one of the causal mechanisms for mass extinctions. During the mid-Cretaceous, oceanic anoxic events (OAEs) occurred several times and had a substantial impact on the biosphere. Planktic foraminifers are marine planktons with calcite tests, and their shells constitute approximately 30%–80% of modern deep-marine calcite; thus, they play a key role in the global carbon cycle. Previous studies have reported that at, or near, the times of major Cretaceous OAEs, planktic foraminifers have a high turnover (extinction and speciation) rate. However, the precise impact of anoxic conditions on the evolutionary trend of planktic foraminifers remained obscure. In this study, we investigate this by assessing the extinction/speciation rate of planktic foraminifers around OAEs. Our results suggest that the development of anoxia during OAEs would not have had a direct effect on the evolutionary trend (i.e., species number and turnover ratio). Two foraminiferal turnovers occurred around OAE1a and OAE2, however, all five turnover peaks seem to be largely associated with a relatively short-term (0.5–3 Myr) eustatic curve. Decreasing species numbers of planktic foraminifers are associated with a relatively lower sea eustatic level (second-order; ~20 Myr) and a small latitudinal temperature gradient around OAE1b, which are not anoxic conditions. Changes in oceanographical parameters (i.e., surface biological productivity, water column structure, carbonate chemistry, and nutrients) related to lowering sea-levels might have had a significant effect on foraminiferal evolutionary trends.
AB - The oceanic redox state has played an essential role in the evolution of life on earth, and oceanic “anoxic events” have been proposed as one of the causal mechanisms for mass extinctions. During the mid-Cretaceous, oceanic anoxic events (OAEs) occurred several times and had a substantial impact on the biosphere. Planktic foraminifers are marine planktons with calcite tests, and their shells constitute approximately 30%–80% of modern deep-marine calcite; thus, they play a key role in the global carbon cycle. Previous studies have reported that at, or near, the times of major Cretaceous OAEs, planktic foraminifers have a high turnover (extinction and speciation) rate. However, the precise impact of anoxic conditions on the evolutionary trend of planktic foraminifers remained obscure. In this study, we investigate this by assessing the extinction/speciation rate of planktic foraminifers around OAEs. Our results suggest that the development of anoxia during OAEs would not have had a direct effect on the evolutionary trend (i.e., species number and turnover ratio). Two foraminiferal turnovers occurred around OAE1a and OAE2, however, all five turnover peaks seem to be largely associated with a relatively short-term (0.5–3 Myr) eustatic curve. Decreasing species numbers of planktic foraminifers are associated with a relatively lower sea eustatic level (second-order; ~20 Myr) and a small latitudinal temperature gradient around OAE1b, which are not anoxic conditions. Changes in oceanographical parameters (i.e., surface biological productivity, water column structure, carbonate chemistry, and nutrients) related to lowering sea-levels might have had a significant effect on foraminiferal evolutionary trends.
KW - Evolutionary trend
KW - OAE1a
KW - OAE2
KW - Oceanic anoxic event
KW - Planktic foraminifer
KW - Turnover (extinction/speciation) rate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092214853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092214853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.marmicro.2020.101924
DO - 10.1016/j.marmicro.2020.101924
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85092214853
SN - 0377-8398
VL - 161
JO - Marine Micropaleontology
JF - Marine Micropaleontology
M1 - 101924
ER -