Which Has Stronger Impacts on Regional Segregation: Industrial Agglomeration or Ethnolinguistic Clustering?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate how regional segregation patterns are affected by industrial agglomeration and ethnic clustering, by adding the externality of ethnicity to the model of agglomeration and trade proposed by Ottaviano et al. (2002. Agglomeration and trade revisited, International Economic Review, 43, 409–436). We show that ethnic segregation patterns are persistent, while ethnic mixing distribution appears only when trade costs are intermediate and ethnicity clustering preferences are less intense. Further, discrepancies of the social optimum and equilibrium are caused because the social optimum is less sensitive to a change in trade costs, when the population of farmers (immobile factors affecting ethnicity utilities) is sufficiently large.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)428-450
Number of pages23
JournalSpatial Economic Analysis
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Oct 2
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ethnicity externality
  • ethnicity clustering
  • industrial agglomeration
  • segregation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Which Has Stronger Impacts on Regional Segregation: Industrial Agglomeration or Ethnolinguistic Clustering?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this