TY - JOUR
T1 - Atom Probe Tomography Interlaboratory Study on Clustering Analysis in Experimental Data Using the Maximum Separation Distance Approach
AU - Dong, Yan
AU - Etienne, Auriane
AU - Frolov, Alex
AU - Fedotova, Svetlana
AU - Fujii, Katsuhiko
AU - Fukuya, Koji
AU - Hatzoglou, Constantinos
AU - Kuleshova, Evgenia
AU - Lindgren, Kristina
AU - London, Andrew
AU - Lopez, Anabelle
AU - Lozano-Perez, Sergio
AU - Miyahara, Yuichi
AU - Nagai, Yasuyoshi
AU - Nishida, Kenji
AU - Radiguet, Bertrand
AU - Schreiber, Daniel K.
AU - Soneda, Naoki
AU - Thuvander, Mattias
AU - Toyama, Takeshi
AU - Wang, Jing
AU - Sefta, Faiza
AU - Chou, Peter
AU - Marquis, Emmanuelle A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The voluntary participation by most members of the APT interlaboratory study, financial support of EPRI and EDF-MAI for the analysis of the aggregate results and preparation of the samples at the University of Michigan, Gary Was at the University of Michigan for providing the proton irradiated sample, and Allen Hunter at
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2019.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - We summarize the findings from an interlaboratory study conducted between ten international research groups and investigate the use of the commonly used maximum separation distance and local concentration thresholding methods for solute clustering quantification. The study objectives are: to bring clarity to the range of applicability of the methods; identify existing and/or needed modifications; and interpretation of past published data. Participants collected experimental data from a proton-irradiated 304 stainless steel and analyzed Cu-rich and Ni-Si rich clusters. The datasets were also analyzed by one researcher to clarify variability originating from different operators. The Cu distribution fulfills the ideal requirements of the maximum separation method (MSM), namely a dilute matrix Cu concentration and concentrated Cu clusters. This enabled a relatively tight distribution of the cluster number density among the participants. By contrast, the group analysis of the Ni-Si rich clusters by the MSM was complicated by a high Ni matrix concentration and by the presence of Si-decorated dislocations, leading to larger variability among researchers. While local concentration filtering could, in principle, tighten the results, the cluster identification step inevitably maintained a high scatter. Recommendations regarding reporting, selection of analysis method, and expected variability when interpreting published data are discussed.
AB - We summarize the findings from an interlaboratory study conducted between ten international research groups and investigate the use of the commonly used maximum separation distance and local concentration thresholding methods for solute clustering quantification. The study objectives are: to bring clarity to the range of applicability of the methods; identify existing and/or needed modifications; and interpretation of past published data. Participants collected experimental data from a proton-irradiated 304 stainless steel and analyzed Cu-rich and Ni-Si rich clusters. The datasets were also analyzed by one researcher to clarify variability originating from different operators. The Cu distribution fulfills the ideal requirements of the maximum separation method (MSM), namely a dilute matrix Cu concentration and concentrated Cu clusters. This enabled a relatively tight distribution of the cluster number density among the participants. By contrast, the group analysis of the Ni-Si rich clusters by the MSM was complicated by a high Ni matrix concentration and by the presence of Si-decorated dislocations, leading to larger variability among researchers. While local concentration filtering could, in principle, tighten the results, the cluster identification step inevitably maintained a high scatter. Recommendations regarding reporting, selection of analysis method, and expected variability when interpreting published data are discussed.
KW - cluster analysis
KW - maximum separation
KW - satom probe tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061082960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061082960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1431927618015581
DO - 10.1017/S1431927618015581
M3 - Article
C2 - 30712527
AN - SCOPUS:85061082960
SN - 1431-9276
VL - 25
SP - 356
EP - 366
JO - Microscopy and Microanalysis
JF - Microscopy and Microanalysis
IS - 2
ER -