TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography with ultra-high-resolution CT
T2 - Comparison with invasive coronary angiography
AU - Takagi, Hidenobu
AU - Tanaka, Ryoichi
AU - Nagata, Kyohei
AU - Ninomiya, Ryo
AU - Arakita, Kazumasa
AU - Schuijf, Joanne D.
AU - Yoshioka, Kunihiro
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank all staff members of the Division of Cardiovascular Radiology, Iwate Medical University Hospital for their support of the present study. This work was supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI, Grant Number 17K18044).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - Purpose: Recently, ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (U-HRCT) with a 0.25 mm × 128-row detector was introduced. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using U-HRCT. Methods: This retrospective study included 38 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent CCTA with U-HRCT followed by invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Per-segment diameter stenosis was calculated. Diagnostic performance of CCTA relative to ICA as the reference standard was determined. For segments with >30% diameter stenosis, the correlation and agreement of percent diameter stenosis between CCTA and ICA were calculated. Results: Obstructive CAD was observed in 65 segments (12%) of 51 vessels (45%) in 32 patients (84%) during ICA. The per-patient, vessel, and segment analyses showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95%–100%), 96% (95% CI: 89%–99%) and 95% (95% CI: 89%–98%), respectively, and a specificity of 67% (95% CI: 38%–67%), 81% (95% CI: 75%–83%) and 96% (95% CI: 96%–97%), respectively. The percentage of diameter stenosis, as determined by CCTA, demonstrated an excellent correlation with ICA (R = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83–0.95) and a slight significant overestimation (mean: 4% ± 7%, p <.01), with the agreed range of limits being ± 16%. The median effective radiation dose for CCTA was 5.4 mSv (range: 2.9–18.0 mSv). Conclusions: CCTA with U-HRCT demonstrated an excellent correlation and agreement with ICA in the quantification of coronary artery stenosis.
AB - Purpose: Recently, ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (U-HRCT) with a 0.25 mm × 128-row detector was introduced. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using U-HRCT. Methods: This retrospective study included 38 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent CCTA with U-HRCT followed by invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Per-segment diameter stenosis was calculated. Diagnostic performance of CCTA relative to ICA as the reference standard was determined. For segments with >30% diameter stenosis, the correlation and agreement of percent diameter stenosis between CCTA and ICA were calculated. Results: Obstructive CAD was observed in 65 segments (12%) of 51 vessels (45%) in 32 patients (84%) during ICA. The per-patient, vessel, and segment analyses showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95%–100%), 96% (95% CI: 89%–99%) and 95% (95% CI: 89%–98%), respectively, and a specificity of 67% (95% CI: 38%–67%), 81% (95% CI: 75%–83%) and 96% (95% CI: 96%–97%), respectively. The percentage of diameter stenosis, as determined by CCTA, demonstrated an excellent correlation with ICA (R = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83–0.95) and a slight significant overestimation (mean: 4% ± 7%, p <.01), with the agreed range of limits being ± 16%. The median effective radiation dose for CCTA was 5.4 mSv (range: 2.9–18.0 mSv). Conclusions: CCTA with U-HRCT demonstrated an excellent correlation and agreement with ICA in the quantification of coronary artery stenosis.
KW - Coronary artery disease
KW - Coronary CT angiography
KW - Invasive coronary angiography
KW - Ultra-High-Resolution CT (U-HRCT)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041610783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041610783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.030
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 29571798
AN - SCOPUS:85041610783
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 101
SP - 30
EP - 37
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
ER -