TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of Himawari-8 surface downwelling solar radiation by ground-based measurements
AU - Damiani, Alessandro
AU - Irie, Hitoshi
AU - Horio, Takashi
AU - Takamura, Tamio
AU - Khatri, Pradeep
AU - Takenaka, Hideaki
AU - Nagao, Takashi
AU - Nakajima, Takashi Y.
AU - Cordero, Raul R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements. The present study was supported by the JST/CREST/EMS/TEEDDA fund, grant number JPMJCR15K4, Japan. We thank the Japan Meteorological Agency for providing the ground-based observations used in this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) 2018.
PY - 2018/4/27
Y1 - 2018/4/27
N2 - Observations from the new Japanese geostationary satellite Himawari-8 permit quasi-real-time estimation of global shortwave radiation at an unprecedented temporal resolution. However, accurate comparisons with ground-truthing observations are essential to assess their uncertainty. In this study, we evaluated the Himawari-8 global radiation product AMATERASS using observations recorded at four SKYNET stations in Japan and, for certain analyses, from the surface network of the Japanese Meteorological Agency in 2016. We found that the spatiotemporal variability of the satellite estimates was smaller than that of the ground observations; variability decreased with increases in the time step and spatial domain. Cloud variability was the main source of uncertainty in the satellite radiation estimates, followed by direct effects caused by aerosols and bright albedo. Under all-sky conditions, good agreement was found between satellite and ground-based data, with a mean bias in the range of 20-30 W mg-2 (i.e., AMATERASS overestimated ground observations) and a root mean square error (RMSE) of approximately 70-80 W mg-2. However, results depended on the time step used in the validation exercise, on the spatial domain, and on the different climatological regions. In particular, the validation performed at 2.5 min showed largest deviations and RMSE values ranging from about 110 W mg-2 for the mainland to a maximum of 150 W mg-2 in the subtropical region. We also detected a limited overestimation in the number of clear-sky episodes, particularly at the pixel level. Overall, satellite-based estimates were higher under overcast conditions, whereas frequent episodes of cloud-induced enhanced surface radiation (i.e., measured radiation was greater than expected clear-sky radiation) tended to reduce this difference. Finally, the total mean bias was approximately 10-15 W mg-2 under clear-sky conditions, mainly because of overall instantaneous direct aerosol forcing efficiency in the range of 120-150 W mg-2 per unit of aerosol optical depth (AOD). A seasonal anticorrelation between AOD and global radiation differences was evident at all stations and was also observed within the diurnal cycle.
AB - Observations from the new Japanese geostationary satellite Himawari-8 permit quasi-real-time estimation of global shortwave radiation at an unprecedented temporal resolution. However, accurate comparisons with ground-truthing observations are essential to assess their uncertainty. In this study, we evaluated the Himawari-8 global radiation product AMATERASS using observations recorded at four SKYNET stations in Japan and, for certain analyses, from the surface network of the Japanese Meteorological Agency in 2016. We found that the spatiotemporal variability of the satellite estimates was smaller than that of the ground observations; variability decreased with increases in the time step and spatial domain. Cloud variability was the main source of uncertainty in the satellite radiation estimates, followed by direct effects caused by aerosols and bright albedo. Under all-sky conditions, good agreement was found between satellite and ground-based data, with a mean bias in the range of 20-30 W mg-2 (i.e., AMATERASS overestimated ground observations) and a root mean square error (RMSE) of approximately 70-80 W mg-2. However, results depended on the time step used in the validation exercise, on the spatial domain, and on the different climatological regions. In particular, the validation performed at 2.5 min showed largest deviations and RMSE values ranging from about 110 W mg-2 for the mainland to a maximum of 150 W mg-2 in the subtropical region. We also detected a limited overestimation in the number of clear-sky episodes, particularly at the pixel level. Overall, satellite-based estimates were higher under overcast conditions, whereas frequent episodes of cloud-induced enhanced surface radiation (i.e., measured radiation was greater than expected clear-sky radiation) tended to reduce this difference. Finally, the total mean bias was approximately 10-15 W mg-2 under clear-sky conditions, mainly because of overall instantaneous direct aerosol forcing efficiency in the range of 120-150 W mg-2 per unit of aerosol optical depth (AOD). A seasonal anticorrelation between AOD and global radiation differences was evident at all stations and was also observed within the diurnal cycle.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046286716&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046286716&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/amt-11-2501-2018
DO - 10.5194/amt-11-2501-2018
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046286716
SN - 1867-1381
VL - 11
SP - 2501
EP - 2521
JO - Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
JF - Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
IS - 4
ER -