TY - JOUR
T1 - Increase in carbon prices
T2 - analysis of energy-economy modeling
AU - Hatase, Kazushi
AU - Managi, Shunsuke
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies and Springer Japan.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - This study examines the mechanisms of social cost of carbon (SCC) and marginal abatement cost (MAC) in climate change modeling. To examine these mechanisms, we observed the shifts in the marginal benefit (MB) and marginal cost (MC) curves of carbon dioxide (CO2) abatement when parameter values are changed. In the observation, we used the DICE model proposed by Nordhaus (A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New Haven, 2008) changing 24 parameters for the observation. In consequent, firstly, we have found that discount rate is not only one of the parameters which significantly raise the carbon price, that is, other parameters may have significant impact too. Secondly, we have found that there are two patterns in the rise of the SCC, and three patterns in the rise of the MAC. Thirdly, we have found that the difference between the rise of the SCC and MAC is primarily caused by the horizontal MB curve in CO2 emissions reduction; an upward shift of MC curve raises MAC but never raises the SCC. Thus, the choice of the SCC or MAC may make the change of carbon price different, affecting global warming policy.
AB - This study examines the mechanisms of social cost of carbon (SCC) and marginal abatement cost (MAC) in climate change modeling. To examine these mechanisms, we observed the shifts in the marginal benefit (MB) and marginal cost (MC) curves of carbon dioxide (CO2) abatement when parameter values are changed. In the observation, we used the DICE model proposed by Nordhaus (A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New Haven, 2008) changing 24 parameters for the observation. In consequent, firstly, we have found that discount rate is not only one of the parameters which significantly raise the carbon price, that is, other parameters may have significant impact too. Secondly, we have found that there are two patterns in the rise of the SCC, and three patterns in the rise of the MAC. Thirdly, we have found that the difference between the rise of the SCC and MAC is primarily caused by the horizontal MB curve in CO2 emissions reduction; an upward shift of MC curve raises MAC but never raises the SCC. Thus, the choice of the SCC or MAC may make the change of carbon price different, affecting global warming policy.
KW - Climate change
KW - Energy-economy model
KW - Marginal abatement cost
KW - Sensitivity analysis
KW - Social cost of carbon
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925946340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925946340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10018-014-0101-2
DO - 10.1007/s10018-014-0101-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84925946340
SN - 1432-847X
VL - 17
SP - 241
EP - 262
JO - Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
JF - Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
IS - 2
ER -