TY - JOUR
T1 - Neural correlates of processing situational relationships between a part and the whole
T2 - An fMRI study
AU - Wakusawa, Keisuke
AU - Sugiura, Motoaki
AU - Sassa, Yuko
AU - Jeong, Hyeonjeong
AU - Horie, Kaoru
AU - Sato, Shigeru
AU - Yokoyama, Hiroyuki
AU - Tsuchiya, Shigeru
AU - Kawashima, Ryuta
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Atsushi Sekiguchi (IDAC, Sendai, Japan) and Ai Fukushima (IDAC, Sendai, Japan) for support in stimulus preparation. This study was supported by RISTEX/JST, CREST/JST, and the 21st Century Center of Excellence (COE) Program (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) entitled “A Strategic Research and Education Center for an Integrated Approach to Language, Brain and Cognition” (Tohoku University). Motoaki Sugiura is supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) (KAKENHI 18680026) (MEXT).
PY - 2009/11/1
Y1 - 2009/11/1
N2 - Daily situations involve many objects and behaviors. To comprehend the meaning of situations, the relationships between objects, behaviors, and the situational context are important. To reveal the cortical networks involved in processing these relationships we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to compare brain activation during processing of behavior-situation and object-situation relationships. Each session examined two aspects of situational relationship processing: monitoring of the situational relationship and responses to irrelevant relationships. Monitoring was analyzed by comparing cortical activation during a situational relevance judgment task with that during a physical appropriateness judgment task. Responses were analyzed by comparing neural responses to situationally irrelevant and situationally relevant components. The left medial frontal cortex, fusiform gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, calcarine sulcus, right anterior middle temporal gyrus, orbitoinsular junction, and occipito-temporo-parietal junction were commonly activated while monitoring relationships of both types. The right anterior middle temporal gyrus and orbitoinsular junction were considered to have roles in implicit monitoring because they were more deactivated during physical judgment tasks than during the resting state; this deactivation seemed to reflect unconscious situational monitoring in the resting state. Other regions seemed to be linked to explicit conscious monitoring. Responses to irrelevance were linked to separate and category-specific cortical activation in the left medial frontal cortex and frontal pole for behavioral irrelevance and in the left orbitofrontal cortex for irrelevant objects. We demonstrated that the hierarchical structure of processing situational relationships consisted of implicit monitoring, explicit monitoring, and category-specific responses to irrelevance.
AB - Daily situations involve many objects and behaviors. To comprehend the meaning of situations, the relationships between objects, behaviors, and the situational context are important. To reveal the cortical networks involved in processing these relationships we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to compare brain activation during processing of behavior-situation and object-situation relationships. Each session examined two aspects of situational relationship processing: monitoring of the situational relationship and responses to irrelevant relationships. Monitoring was analyzed by comparing cortical activation during a situational relevance judgment task with that during a physical appropriateness judgment task. Responses were analyzed by comparing neural responses to situationally irrelevant and situationally relevant components. The left medial frontal cortex, fusiform gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, calcarine sulcus, right anterior middle temporal gyrus, orbitoinsular junction, and occipito-temporo-parietal junction were commonly activated while monitoring relationships of both types. The right anterior middle temporal gyrus and orbitoinsular junction were considered to have roles in implicit monitoring because they were more deactivated during physical judgment tasks than during the resting state; this deactivation seemed to reflect unconscious situational monitoring in the resting state. Other regions seemed to be linked to explicit conscious monitoring. Responses to irrelevance were linked to separate and category-specific cortical activation in the left medial frontal cortex and frontal pole for behavioral irrelevance and in the left orbitofrontal cortex for irrelevant objects. We demonstrated that the hierarchical structure of processing situational relationships consisted of implicit monitoring, explicit monitoring, and category-specific responses to irrelevance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68749090749&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68749090749&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.024
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 19539770
AN - SCOPUS:68749090749
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 48
SP - 486
EP - 496
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
IS - 2
ER -