TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence and risk factors for lymph node metastasis in duodenal neuroendocrine tumors
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Ogata, Yohei
AU - Hatta, Waku
AU - Kanno, Takeshi
AU - Hatayama, Yutaka
AU - Saito, Masahiro
AU - Jin, Xiaoyi
AU - Koike, Tomoyuki
AU - Imatani, Akira
AU - Yuan, Yuhong
AU - Masamune, Atsushi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - Background: Although the status of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is crucial in determining treatment strategy for duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (D-NETs), robust evidence for their potential LNM risk remains lacking. This systematic review aimed to summarize the prevalence and risk factors of LNM in D-NETs. Methods: This systematic review of electronic databases identified eligible case–control and cohort studies for D-NET resected either endoscopically or surgically, published from 1990 to 2023. The primary outcome was the pooled prevalence of LNM in D-NETs. Secondary outcomes included the pooled prevalence of LNM according to tumor location and functionality, as well as identifying pathological risk factors for LNM. Meta-analysis was performed. Results: We identified 36 studies that involved 1,396 patients with D-NETs, including 326 with LNM. The pooled prevalence of LNM in D-NETs was 22.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.3–29.2%). The prevalence was high in ampullary/peri-ampullary D-NETs and functional D-NETs (46.8 and 53.3%, respectively), whereas it was low in non-functional, non-ampullary D-NETs (NAD-NETs) (9.5%). Pathological risk factors for LNM in NAD-NETs included tumor size > 10 mm (odds ratio [OR] 7.31 [95% CI 3.28–16.31]), tumor invasion into the muscularis propria or deeper (OR 7.79 [3.65–16.61]), lymphovascular invasion (OR 5.67 [2.29–14.06]), and World Health Organization grading of G2 (OR 2.47 [1.03–5.92]). Conclusion: Approximately one-fourth of the patients with D-NETs had LNM. Endoscopic resection might be acceptable for non-functional NAD-NETs with diameters of 10 mm or less, but additional surgical resection with lymphadenectomy may be recommended for cases exhibiting pathological risk factors.
AB - Background: Although the status of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is crucial in determining treatment strategy for duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (D-NETs), robust evidence for their potential LNM risk remains lacking. This systematic review aimed to summarize the prevalence and risk factors of LNM in D-NETs. Methods: This systematic review of electronic databases identified eligible case–control and cohort studies for D-NET resected either endoscopically or surgically, published from 1990 to 2023. The primary outcome was the pooled prevalence of LNM in D-NETs. Secondary outcomes included the pooled prevalence of LNM according to tumor location and functionality, as well as identifying pathological risk factors for LNM. Meta-analysis was performed. Results: We identified 36 studies that involved 1,396 patients with D-NETs, including 326 with LNM. The pooled prevalence of LNM in D-NETs was 22.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.3–29.2%). The prevalence was high in ampullary/peri-ampullary D-NETs and functional D-NETs (46.8 and 53.3%, respectively), whereas it was low in non-functional, non-ampullary D-NETs (NAD-NETs) (9.5%). Pathological risk factors for LNM in NAD-NETs included tumor size > 10 mm (odds ratio [OR] 7.31 [95% CI 3.28–16.31]), tumor invasion into the muscularis propria or deeper (OR 7.79 [3.65–16.61]), lymphovascular invasion (OR 5.67 [2.29–14.06]), and World Health Organization grading of G2 (OR 2.47 [1.03–5.92]). Conclusion: Approximately one-fourth of the patients with D-NETs had LNM. Endoscopic resection might be acceptable for non-functional NAD-NETs with diameters of 10 mm or less, but additional surgical resection with lymphadenectomy may be recommended for cases exhibiting pathological risk factors.
KW - Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors
KW - Lymph node metastasis
KW - Pathological risk factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001873745&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105001873745&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00535-025-02247-7
DO - 10.1007/s00535-025-02247-7
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105001873745
SN - 0944-1174
VL - 60
SP - 673
EP - 682
JO - Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 6
M1 - e13306
ER -