TY - JOUR
T1 - Review of engagement activities to promote awareness of radiation and its associated risk amongst the Japanese public before and after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident
AU - Sakoda, Akihiro
AU - Nomura, Naoki
AU - Kuroda, Yujiro
AU - Kono, Takahiko
AU - Naito, Wataru
AU - Yoshida, Hiroko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Society for Radiological Protection. Published on behalf of SRP by IOP Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in 2011, many radiation experts directly experienced a vast gap between ideal and real public understanding (PU) of radiation in risk communication. Therefore, this study collated and reviewed information about PU activities for radiation and its risk that six Japanese academic societies - which seem to be socially neutral expert communities - related to radiation and radiation risk conducted before and after the accident. Activities these radiation-related societies provided to the general public were discussed from the following perspectives: (a) difficulties in two-way communication due to resources, motivation and public interest and concerns; (b) balance between academic research and PU activities; (c) academic societies' building trust with the public while ensuring member experts' neutrality and independence; and (d) discussions among academic societies to prepare for public engagement. We hope that this paper encourages experts and academic societies in radiation protection to hold more national and international discussions about their roles in public communication and outreach.
AB - Following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in 2011, many radiation experts directly experienced a vast gap between ideal and real public understanding (PU) of radiation in risk communication. Therefore, this study collated and reviewed information about PU activities for radiation and its risk that six Japanese academic societies - which seem to be socially neutral expert communities - related to radiation and radiation risk conducted before and after the accident. Activities these radiation-related societies provided to the general public were discussed from the following perspectives: (a) difficulties in two-way communication due to resources, motivation and public interest and concerns; (b) balance between academic research and PU activities; (c) academic societies' building trust with the public while ensuring member experts' neutrality and independence; and (d) discussions among academic societies to prepare for public engagement. We hope that this paper encourages experts and academic societies in radiation protection to hold more national and international discussions about their roles in public communication and outreach.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122166951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122166951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1361-6498/ac2678
DO - 10.1088/1361-6498/ac2678
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34816800
AN - SCOPUS:85122166951
SN - 0952-4746
VL - 41
SP - 1258
EP - 1287
JO - Journal of the Society for Radiological Protection
JF - Journal of the Society for Radiological Protection
IS - 4
ER -