TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of security camera, past littering, environment, and signboards on littering prevention
AU - Nakamata, Tomoko
AU - Abe, Tsuneyuki
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Two experiments were conducted to assess litter control at a riverside location. Experiment 1 examined the effects of a security camera (presence/absence), past littering (presence/absence), and environmental features (tussock/plain ground/flowerbed). Two scenes containing combinations of these factors were presented. Participants chose the scene in which they felt it was to easier to litter. Participants also reported their emotional response to the presence/absence of a security camera and environmental features in scenes with litter. The results revealed that the presence of a security camera, no past littering, flowerbeds, and plain ground inhibited littering. Littering in the presence of a security camera facilitated discomfort, anger, and shame, and littering in flowerbeds caused discomfort, anger, shame, and sadness. Using a similar method, Experiment 2 addressed the particular effects of a security camera combined with other factors: past littering, environmental features, and signboards (no sign/sign with eyes/security camera images). The results demonstrated the effectiveness of a security camera, no past littering, flowerbeds, plain ground, signboards presenting eyes, and images from a security camera in preventing littering.
AB - Two experiments were conducted to assess litter control at a riverside location. Experiment 1 examined the effects of a security camera (presence/absence), past littering (presence/absence), and environmental features (tussock/plain ground/flowerbed). Two scenes containing combinations of these factors were presented. Participants chose the scene in which they felt it was to easier to litter. Participants also reported their emotional response to the presence/absence of a security camera and environmental features in scenes with litter. The results revealed that the presence of a security camera, no past littering, flowerbeds, and plain ground inhibited littering. Littering in the presence of a security camera facilitated discomfort, anger, and shame, and littering in flowerbeds caused discomfort, anger, shame, and sadness. Using a similar method, Experiment 2 addressed the particular effects of a security camera combined with other factors: past littering, environmental features, and signboards (no sign/sign with eyes/security camera images). The results demonstrated the effectiveness of a security camera, no past littering, flowerbeds, plain ground, signboards presenting eyes, and images from a security camera in preventing littering.
KW - Broken windows theory
KW - Norm
KW - Risk perception
KW - Surveillance
KW - Territory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983732406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983732406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4992/jjpsy.87.14057
DO - 10.4992/jjpsy.87.14057
M3 - Article
C2 - 29630167
AN - SCOPUS:84983732406
SN - 0021-5236
VL - 87
SP - 219
EP - 228
JO - Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology
JF - Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology
IS - 3
ER -