What does complete revascularization mean in 2021? – Definitions, implications, and biases

研究成果: ジャーナルへの寄稿総説査読

1 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

Purpose of review Coronary revascularization is known to be an excellent treatment for coronary artery disease. However, whether incomplete myocardial revascularization compromises long-term outcomes, as compared to complete revascularization (CR), remains contentious. Herein, we review the concept of and evidence on CR/incomplete revascularization (ICR) and discuss future perspectives. Recent findings When possible, achieving CR in coronary artery bypass grafting is desirable; nonetheless, ICR is also a reasonable option to balance the therapeutic benefits against the risks. Summary Although angiography-based assessment currently remains the standard of care, fractional flow reserve guidance may reduce the number of lesions requiring revascularization, which may be helpful for an appropriate surgical revascularization strategy. In particular, utilizing this approach may refine hybrid revascularization procedures, especially among high-risk patients.

本文言語英語
ページ(範囲)748-754
ページ数7
ジャーナルCurrent Opinion in Cardiology
36
6
DOI
出版ステータス出版済み - 2021 11月 1

フィンガープリント

「What does complete revascularization mean in 2021? – Definitions, implications, and biases」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル